BL:UF
THE BOTTOM LINEEvidence first · context included · a way to act when one exists
Topic
Civil Liberties
4 stories
The Supreme Court Decides This Week Whether to Hear a Case That Could Let ICE Detain Millions Without a Bond Hearing

The Supreme Court Decides This Week Whether to Hear a Case That Could Let ICE Detain Millions Without a Bond Hearing

Ricardo Barbosa da Cunha lived in Massachusetts for two decades, married, had two kids, and ran a small construction business -- then immigration agents arrested him and said he wasn't entitled to a bond hearing, ever, under a new reading of a 30-year-old law. Nine of 11 federal appeals courts say that reading is wrong. On September 28, the Supreme Court decides whether to even hear the government's appeal of his case -- a decision that could reach as many as 6 million people.

2026-09-26 · report
This Order Was Sold as Stopping Political Violence. Here's How It Got Weaponized Instead.

This Order Was Sold as Stopping Political Violence. Here's How It Got Weaponized Instead.

Last September, Trump signed an order to stop "organized political violence." Since then, the government has used it to spy on America's largest union, investigate nonprofits' bank records, and help a state brand a Muslim civil rights group "terrorists" — while the one time it's produced an actual terrorism conviction, the "threat" it caught was a small group that had already shot at a police officer. That gap between what this policy was sold as and who it's actually hit is the story.

2026-09-20 · report
One March Got "Free Speech." The Other Got Troops.

One March Got "Free Speech." The Other Got Troops.

On July 4, masked white nationalists marched past the U.S. Capitol, and a sitting Cabinet secretary called it "free speech" in a "messy democracy." Over the past year, the same administration met immigration protesters — including peaceful ones and bystanders — with troops a federal judge ruled were deployed illegally, mass subpoenas for critics' data, facial-recognition surveillance, and the label "insurrectionists." The conduct at those events wasn't identical. But the government's own words and posture flipped depending on who was marching, and for what.

2026-07-06 · analysis
Your Kid's School Surveillance File Starts Before They're Old Enough to Consent. Sometimes It Ends With Police.

Your Kid's School Surveillance File Starts Before They're Old Enough to Consent. Sometimes It Ends With Police.

A child's school surveillance file can start with a laptop login, a cafeteria fingerprint scan, or a bus ID badge -- years before they're old enough to understand, let alone meaningfully consent to, the bargain. It runs through monitoring software reading their messages, biometric payment systems, GPS-tracked buses, hallway cameras, and data shared with an average of more than 2,700 ed-tech tools per district, most with no FTC action ever taken against them. The most alarming place that file can lead: AI monitoring software has already put a 13-year-old in a jail cell over a joke, and sent dozens more kids to psychiatric holds over false alarms -- one branch of a much bigger tree, not the whole thesis.

2026-06-20 · explainer
← All stories